🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive action to restrict social platforms access for young people below 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Politicians, child protection groups, and families are monitoring intently to see if this approach will set a precedent for countries abroad.

Across Europe Trend

In Europe, a increasing number of nations are exploring parallel bans.

• The Danish government has announced a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader stating that smartphones and apps are "taking away our youngsters' youth". A law is expected to be passed next year.
• Norway is preparing to implement a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard young people from the "influence of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a online verification tool to verify the age and identity of social media account holders. The media minister have suggested that an Australian-model ban is "an options on the table".
• In Spain, the president has urged the legislature to enact a bill raising the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a related step, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has recommended families to block their children from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has passed a non-binding motion supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 except if guardian approval is given. While it highlights of the "compulsive" quality of these services, the step does not establish enforceable legislation.

"A clear age limit is a useful first step," said one parliamentarian supporting the measure.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Eye

In the UK, the leadership has not ruled out a potential ban, emphasizing that "nothing is discarded" but insisting any action must be "supported by strong data".

Earlier, momentum gathered behind a proposal to impose limits on social media use by minors, but it was eventually weakened. Instead, the government committed to further research the topic.

Advocacy groups have expressed warnings. One foundation set up by the loved ones of a teenager who took her own life after encountering disturbing social media material contends that a simple age ban might not make platforms safer and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of risk when teens reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a response to the failure of the social media companies to design products and services that are appropriate and age appropriate for minors," stated a leading peer.

The US: A Decentralized Landscape

In the United States, regulation is largely happening at the regional government level against a backdrop of country-wide inaction.

• Utah demands guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and limits overnight use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a bill barring those below 14 from accessing social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has approved a rule restricting under-16s to one hour of social media use per day, with extra use needing adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly passed laws demanding guardian approval for teenagers to set up social media profiles.

Despite widespread concern and proposals from some politicians to follow this path, a nationwide ban is right now seen as improbable.

Worldwide Views

Outside of the West, additional nations are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia aims to prohibit social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• Brazil has increased the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

But, international bodies take a more cautious stance. A major UN agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "might prove counterproductive". The agency notes that the internet can be a "vital connection" for marginalized young people and that government action should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to prioritize safety.

While this global debate evolves, the policies of this nation and several other countries indicate that governments internationally are less and less prepared to stand by for the industry to self-regulate.